Prof. Dr. Marie Seong-Hak Kim

St. Clouds State University Minnesota, USA

Curriculum Vitae

Marie Seong-Hak Kim ist Professorin für Geschichte an der St. Clouds State Universität Minnesota, USA. Nach ihrem Studium an der Ewha Womans Universität in Seoul, Korea, wurde sie sowohl im Fach Geschichte als auch in den Rechtswissenschaften an der Universität Minnesota promoviert. Seit 1995 ist sie in Minnesota als Rechtsanwältin zugelassen. Ihre Berufung zur Professorin erfolgte im Jahr 2000. Darüber hinaus ist sie Forschungsmitglied am Institut d'Asie Orientale in Lyon, Frankreich und Mitglied des International Editorial Board of Comparative Legal History.

Prof. Kim ist Trägerin zahlreicher nationaler und internationaler Forschungsstipendien und Preise. So erhielt sie beispielsweise das National Endowment of Humanities Fellowship, das Fulbright Senior Scholar Grant (Korea), das American Philosophical Society Franklin Research Grant und das Academy of Korean Studies Research Fellowship. Des Weiteren war Prof. Kim als Gastprofessorin in Korea sowie als Foundation Research Fellow in Tokio, Japan tätig. In Europa war sie bereits Fellow am Collegium de Lyon, am Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study (NIAS) in Wassenaar sowie am Max-Planck-Institut für europäische Rechtsgeschichte in Frankfurt. Von 2016 bis 2017 war sie EURIAS- und Marie-Curie-Stipendiatin der Europäischen Union am Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies.

Ihr Forschungsschwerpunkt ist die vergleichende Rechtsgeschichte. Sie befasst sich insbesondere mit dem koreanischen, japanischen und französischen Recht. Von April bis August 2019 war Prof. Dr. Marie Seong-Hak Kim Fellow am Käte Hamburger Kolleg „Recht als Kultur“ in Bonn.


„Law and Lineage Property in Korea“

This project examines the legal and cultural foundations of lineage property in Korea from a historical perspective.  Focus is on the courts’ role in reordering and reconstructing the institutions of family, succession, and property relations for the purpose of creating a normative and functional socioeconomic order.  Confucian primacy of filial piety in premodern Korea fostered ritual instrumentalities where private rights remained subsumed under the dictates of kinship identity and ancestral worship ceremonies.  In the early twentieth century under Japanese colonial rule, Korean law underwent a passage from a legal system belonging to the Chinese legal tradition to the Romano-German civil law system, and colonial judges were faced with the task to reconcile patriarchal sociocultural structures and property formations with the concepts of economic rationalization and individual rights.  Interestingly, while ritual succession lost legal meaning and the process of privatization of land diminished the importance of the old lineage institution, ancestor reverence ideology and the attendant spiritual as well as social significations powerfully survived into the postcolonial years.  Today South Korean courts are regularly asked to adjudicate cases steeped in Confucian patrilineal and patrimonial precepts in terms of the principles of equality and other basic rights guaranteed in the nation’s Constitution.  Evolution of lineage property laws and practices in Korea offers an arena in which one can approach dialectic tensions between traditional ritual dynamic and modern legal logic in reference to historical and empirical evidence.

Publikationen (Auswahl)

Monographien und Herausgeberschaften

  • Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges: The Courts of South Korea, Cambridge University Press (forthcoming 2019).
  • The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context, Brill, Nijhoff, 2016.
  • Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  • Michel de L'Hôpital: the Vision of a Reformist Chancellor during the French Religious Wars, Kirksville, Truman State University Press (Sixteenth Century Essays & Studies, vol. 36), 1997.

Artikel und Buchbeiträge

  • “Custom as a Source of Law in European and East Asian History,” in Comparative Legal History Handbook, eds. Kjell A Modeer, Aniceto Masferrer, and Olivier Moreteau, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing (2019), pp. 186-211.
  • “Michel de L'Hôpital and Christophe de Thou: Two Perceptions of Royal Justice during the French Religious Wars,” in Suum Cuique Tribuere: Legal Contexts, Judicial Archetypes and Deep-Structures Regarding Courts of Appeal and Judiciaries from Early Modern to Late Modern Europe, eds. Kjell A. Modeer and Matin Sunnqvist, Stockholm: Institutet för Rättshistorisk Forskning, Olin Foundation (2018), pp. 131-173.
  • “Colonial Law Revisited: Courts, Jurisprudence and Legal Policy under Japanese Rule,” in The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context, ed. by Marie Seong-Hak Kim, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff (2016), pp. 129-154.
  • “Confucianism that Confounds: Constitutional Jurisprudence on Filial Piety in Korea,” in Confucianism, Law, and Democracy in Contemporary Korea, ed. Sungmoon Kim, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield (2015), pp. 57-80.
  • "Travails of Judges: Judicial Process under Authoritarian Rule in South Korea," The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 63, No. 3 (2015): 601-654.
  • “La coutume et la raison comme sources de droit dans la première moitié de l’ère Meiji,” in Droit japonais, droit français, Quel dialogue ?, ed. Beatrice Jaluzot, Geneva: Schulthess (2014), pp. 57-77.
  • "Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Rule of Law in Korea: Revisiting the Yusin Period (1972-1980)," The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2013), pp. 178-203.
  • "In the Name of Custom, Culture, and the Constitution: Korean Customary Law in Flux," Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 48, No. 3 (2013): 357-391.